Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Statement||edited by Klaus F. Röhl and Stefan Machura.|
|Series||Oñati international series in law and society|
|Contributions||Röhl, Klaus F., Machura, Stefan.|
|LC Classifications||K2110 .P76 1997|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xv, 240 p. :|
|Number of Pages||240|
|ISBN 10||1855219190, 1855219212|
|LC Control Number||97000469|
Book Condition: Hardcover. Binding solid, pages crisp and clean, highlighting scattered throughout. Dust jacket bright and shiny with light crease along front edge, some scuffs and dents. Extremities lightly . Book Description. This collection of essays brings together the very best philosophical and legal writings on procedural justice over the last half century. Core concepts in Anglo-American jurisprudence, such as equal protection, due process, and the rule of law, are explained and criticized. Procedural justice turns out to be important for the legitimacy of a political rule as well as for the acceptance of administrative decisions. The volume deals with the interrelation between. First published in , this volume explores how procedural justice, the fairness of the way decisions are reached, is an important factor in human behaviour. In this book we see the ways that it is important for the legitimacy of a political rule as well as for the acceptance of administrative decisions.
Distributive and Procedural Justice Resear ch: Epistemology, Method and Application How to measure people’ s justice judgments has been the subject of several debates. Procedural Justice Procedural justice seeks to ensure that the justice system treats everybody with dignity and respect. Research has shown that when court users perceive the justice system to be fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and follow the law in the future—regardless of the outcome of their case. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Book January Tom Tyler and I recently published a book exploring the process of legal socialization. This project will be a clearinghouse. Procedural justice concerns the fairness and the transparency of the processes by which decisions are made, and may be contrasted with distributive justice (fairness in the distribution of rights or resources), and retributive justice (fairness in the punishment of wrongs). Hearing all parties before a decision is made is one step which would be considered appropriate to be taken in order that a process may then .
In Constructive Divorce: Procedural Justice and Sociolegal Reform, author Penelope Eileen Bryan offers a compelling argument that the procedures used to settle divorce disputes yield unjust decisions and poor outcomes for millions of adults and children each year.. This well-researched, carefully constructed book discusses the benefits of improving procedural justice in divorce cases (greater Pages: The Center for Court Innovation's publication, 'To Be Fair: Conversations About Procedural Justice,' is a compilation of interviews with more than 20 . Procedural justice theory assumes: •People know they can’t always win. • People will be more likely to accept losing if they perceive as fair the procedures and interpersonal treatment they received. Procedures vs. Outcomes (c) Center for Court InnovationFile Size: 7MB. Procedural Justice. Fundamentally, procedural justice concerns the fairness and the transparency of the processes by which decisions are made, and may be contrasted with distributive justice (fairness in the distribution of rights or resources), and retributive justice (fairness in the punishment of wrongs).